End Of Knowledge

Tag: brahman

A Conversation with Ashtavakra Pt. 16

Read Part 15 / Ask a Question / Support End of Knowledge

CHAPTER NINE

Ashtavakra said:

9:1 – What is done and what is not done, as well as the pairs of opposites—when do they cease and for whom? Knowing thus, be indifferent to everything, even renunciation.

Action is defined according to the opposites of good and bad. And resolving to avoid bad actions is renunciation. Renouncing bad actions is essential for purifying the mind in order to prepare it for self-knowledge but upon gaining self-knowledge, renunciation loses its meaning. Why? Because you see that duality—such as good and evil—is not real. And furthermore, you understand that as consciousness-existence you’re not the doer. So you can’t perform any action, good or bad, let alone renounce any action.

When you know you’re consciousness-existence, does that mean the body-mind you formerly identified with can abandon all notions of decent behavior and start robbing, killing or just being a self-centered jerk? No. Because as the verse astutely points out, doership and the pairs of opposites never cease. They still totally apply to the body-mind, assuming it wants to avoid being an inmate or an outcast from society.

If you contend that doership and duality cease for you, consciousness-existence, you’d be wrong. Why? Because they never applied to you in the first place.

9:2 – One is fortunate whose desire for life, enjoyment, and learning have been extinguished by observing the ways of the world.

When you observe the world and truly see that everything in it is impermanent, it’s to your benefit to become dispassionate, meaning objective. Because if everything is impermanent attachment is illogical and unnecessary, assuming you enjoy peace of mind. But dispassion isn’t cold-hearted stoicism, it’s simply appreciating things while they last and for what they’re worth, never expecting them to give something they can never give e.g. permanent happiness.

9:3 – Everything is indeed impermanent, spoiled by the threefold affliction of being worthless, contemptible and fit for rejection. Understand this clearly and you come to peace.

This verse reinforces the last and it employs a bit of hyperbole. Are friends and family really “worthless, contemptible and for rejection”? Well, maybe some people’s family and friends are but really, the meaning here is the same as before: Be clear that nothing in the world lasts; accept that fact and be at peace.

9:4 – At what time or at what age do the pairs of opposites not exist? Disregard them and you will attain perfection.

Duality is a problem for people of every age. But the good news is that anyone at any time can disregard it by seeing that it’s an illusion. Then you ‘attain’ perfection by seeing that you’re the ever-perfect, undivided self. Technically, you can’t attain this status because you are, and always have been, the self.

9:5 – After observing the diverse beliefs of the great seers, saints and yogis, attain equanimity by becoming completely indifferent to them.

Every religion and philosophy has different views about your true nature. And since those views often conflict with one another, they can’t all be right. So at some point you have to investigate the ones that appeal to you and with luck, you’ll find out who you really are. Once you’ve seen that for yourself, the so-called spiritual quest is over and you can rest easy. And then the innumerable beliefs of various teachings which formerly seemed bewildering become completely immaterial. Because what does someone’s opinion matter in the face of firsthand experience and understanding?

9:6 – A teacher is one who has gained clear knowledge that they are consciousness. Through indifference, equanimity and reasoning, they help others escape self-ignorance (samsara).

Knowing that you’re consciousness-existence is the most important prerequisite for being a teacher (because how can you teach what you don’t know?). Your personal behavior, even though it can be an inspiring example to students, is secondary. So don’t be concerned if your mind isn’t perfectly indifferent and equanimous—after all, self-knowledge is knowing you aren’t the mind in any way. But if your mind lacks the ability to reason, meaning the ability to employ reason based on the logic of Vedanta, you’re dead in the water (at least as a teacher). In that case, shut down your website, disband your satsang and quietly enjoy your enlightenment—otherwise you’ll just confuse people.

9:7 – Look upon all objects as modifications of the elements and abide in your true nature (consciousness-existence) and you will at once be free from bondage.

Anything that changes is unreal. If all objects—both mental and physical—are simply modifications of the elements (matter), they’re unreal and can’t be you. Furthermore, as matter they’re non-conscious—another reason they can’t be you. Once you see that you’re not an unreal, non-conscious object (specifically the body-mind) you’re free from bondage because you know that as consciousness-existence, you were never bound.

9:8 – Your vasanas alone are samsara. Knowing this, renounce them all. The renunciation of your vasanas is the renunciation of samsara. Be established [in your true nature] regardless of external circumstances.

Your vasanas are your personal collection of desires and mental inclinations. Samsara, in a general sense, is the world. But more specifically it means the everyday cycle of identifying with objects (specifically the body-mind) and the suffering caused by trying to gain or keep desired objects while avoiding or getting rid of undesired objects. If you think about it, what’s your personal world comprised of other than what you want, what you don’t want and how you’re inclined to go about getting what you want or avoiding what you don’t want? In that way, your vasanas are samsara.

Knowing this, it seems reasonable to try and escape samsara by renouncing or destroying the vasanas. But this method won’t work. Because even though you can achieve a significant reduction in desire and a drastic change in your personal inclinations, unless the body-mind is dead, there’s no end to your wants and mental conditioning. So there’s no end to your samsara. A different approach is needed.

Enter Vedanta, which says that to escape the samsara of your vasanas, you simply need to realize that they aren’t your vasanas in the first place. The mind, the container of all desires and inclinations, is an unreal, transient object. And it’s not you, consciousness-existence, which is ever-free of the mind and all its vasanas. So to end samsara, stop identifying with the mind.

To be clear, working on the mind to rid it of excessive desire and negative inclinations is a very constructive endeavor, one that is an essential preparatory step on the spiritual path. But it doesn’t equate to self-knowledge which is dis-identification with the mind in general.

Read Part 15 / Ask a Question / Support End of Knowledge

January 10, 2019
A Conversation with Ashtavakra Pt. 7

Have a question? Ask Here.

Want to support End of Knowledge? Donate Here.

Read Part 6 here.

Janaka said:

2:11 – Salutations to myself who would not be destroyed even if the entire universe, from the creator down to a clump of grass, were destroyed.

The universe is purely an illusion so regardless of its condition or whether it be present or absent, you remain completely unchanged.

The mention of a creator in this verse does establish that one actually exists any more than the mention of a clump of grass establishes the reality of grass—they are both illusory. This means the creator and the grass are mentioned figuratively for the sake of example in order to make it clear that absolutely everything in the apparent creation—from the ‘highest’ (the creator) to the ‘lowest’ (a clump of grass)—could be destroyed and you would be unaffected. But this does not change the fact that the creator and the grass never really exist. In a non-dual reality, there is only the self-existent self that never changes—nothing, therefore, can be created. If nothing can be created, then there can’t be a creator.

Student: Isn’t the universe a creation?

Teacher: No, it is an illusion.

Student: Well, isn’t the illusion of the universe a creation, like an illusion created by a magician?

Teacher: When a magician saws a person in half, does she create a person that has been cut in two?

Student: No.

Teacher: Then how can you speak of a magician creating something?

Student: Granted, the magician doesn’t literally create a person sawed in half. But she does create the appearance of a person sawed in half, yes?

Teacher: Yes. But the magician is separate from her illusion—they are distinct entities. So your example doesn’t apply to the topic at hand because unlike the duality of the magician and her illusion, reality is non-dual. There is only you, consciousness-existence, not you plus a creation called “illusion.”

Student: But I see the illusion.

Teacher: I do too. No one is denying that. But my point is that seeing the illusion of the universe doesn’t mean the universe actually exists or that it’s a literal creation. Tell me: is the illusion of the universe separate or non-separate from consciousness-existence?

Student: If reality is non-dual, then it must be non-separate.

Teacher: So the illusion of the universe can’t be anything other than consciousness-existence, correct?

Student: Yes.

Teacher: Is consciousness-existence ever created? Does it ever change?

Student: No. It is self-existent and it doesn’t change.

Teacher: Creation, by definition, is when something new is brought into existence or something already existent is changed to make something new. If consciousness-existence is the only thing that exists and it can’t be created or changed, creation is not possible. Creation is only an idea, a baseless illusion caused by not knowing that what appears to be the creation is really consciousness-existence.

Student: What if the universe isn’t brought into existence because it already exists in a potential form in consciousness-existence, similar to the way a pot exists in a potential form in clay? That way, creation is the universe manifesting, like a pot manifesting from clay.

Teacher: Manifestation implies change so on those grounds, creation is still not possible.

Student: But the fundamental nature of consciousness-existence wouldn’t change because the manifestation of the universe would only be apparent. It would be like a pot apparently manifesting from clay without changing the fundamental nature of the clay.

Teacher: “Apparent manifestation” means “doesn’t actually manifest” and that is just another way of saying illusion—I think you’ve proven my point. But before moving on, let’s take one last look at the notion of the universe existing in consciousness-existence in potential. This is the theory that consciousness-existence is the cause and the universe is the created effect. To see if this can be true, let’s go back to the example of the clay and the pot, the clay being the cause and the pot being the potential effect that exists in the clay. Now, is the potential pot clay or something other than clay?

Student: It would have to be clay.

Teacher: Then nothing other than the clay exists, yes?

Student: Yes.

Teacher: If nothing other than the clay exists, then the pot must be non-existent. And a non-existent pot can never come into existence as an effect. If the effect doesn’t exist, then the clay can’t be a cause. It can only appear to be a cause when the apparent effect of the pot is believed to be a real entity. In the same way, if nothing other than consciousness/existence exists, then the universe must be non-existent. And consciousness-existence can’t be the cause of a non-existent effect. It can only appear to be a cause when the apparent effect of the universe is believed to be real.

Student: This all makes sense on a logical level but the fact that the universe appears as part of my everyday experience makes the issue confusing.

Teacher: Yes, it is confusing—that’s the nature of ignorance. Tell me, have you ever seen a gold bracelet?

Student: Of course.

Teacher: Even though the circular shape of the bracelet appears in your experience, is there anything there besides gold?

Student: No.

Teacher: Ok. You, consciousness-existence are like the gold and the form of the bracelet is like the appearance of the universe. Just as the circular shape is an illusion that is never really produced—despite being seen—the universe is an illusion that is never actually created, even though it is experienced. In the end you can’t even say the universe exists even as an illusion because similar to the way the circular shape of a bracelet is purely gold with nothing added whatsoever, so the universe is absolutely nothing but you, consciousness-existence.

2:12 – Salutations to myself who, despite having a body, am one alone. Because I pervade the entire universe, I neither go anywhere nor come from anywhere.

Based on his previous statement, it’s obvious that Janaka knows he is consciousness-existence and that consciousness-existence never has a body. So when he says “despite having a body, [I] am one alone” he means, “despite looking like I have a body, [I] am one alone.” The one with self-knowledge knows that even though they ‘have’ a body—meaning it continues to appear post-enlightenment—it is an unreal appearance that neither affects nor divides them in any way.

2:13 – Salutations to myself. There is none equal to my capability, I who forever support the entire universe without touching it with the body.

The body-mind is the instrument of action. So what is meant by the statement “without touching it (the universe) with the body” is that consciousness-existence ‘supports’ the universe—meaning it makes the existence of the universe possible—without doing anything whatsoever because existence is it’s very nature. Since nothing but consciousness-existence exists, nothing else has the ‘capability’ to ‘support’ the appearance of the universe by ‘lending’ it existence.

2:14 – Salutation to myself who have nothing or have all that is thought and spoken of.

This is a reiteration of what was said in Verse 2:2.

October 25, 2018
A Conversation with Ashtavakra Pt. 6

This week, Janaka continues his statement of self-knowledge from PART 5.

Janaka said:

2:6 – Just as crystallized sugar is completely permeated by the sweetness of the sugarcane from which it is produced, so the universe produced in me is completely permeated by me.

The true nature of something is that which is essential to its existence, something that, if taken away, the thing itself would cease to be. For instance, if it were possible to remove heat from fire or wetness from water they would no longer exist, because heat and wetness are the essence of fire and water.

On the other hand, an incidental quality of something is that which can be removed or changed while the nature of the thing itself remains unchanged. If the color of fire changes from red to blue, the fact that it’s hot does not. This means the color of the fire—as opposed to heat, its essential nature—is merely an incidental quality. Similarly, the form of water can change from a wave, to mist to rain but the wetness of the water does not; the form of the water is an incidental quality while the wetness of the water is its true nature.

That doesn’t mean an incidental quality is separate from the thing it is removed from. The red, yellow or blue color of a flame is completely permeated by the heat of the fire from which it comes. And there is no wave—from a ripple in a pond to a tsunami in the ocean—that is in any way separate from the wetness of the water from which it is comprised. Knowing this relationship between the essential nature of something and its incidental qualities, what Janaka says in this verse can be understood. Just as crystallized sugar is permeated by sweetness, the essential nature of sugar cane, so the universe is pervaded by consciousness/existence, the essential nature of the self. But unlike sugarcane, which undergoes a real transformation to become sugar—meaning after the sugar is produced, the sugarcane is gone—the self never transforms into objects. It only appears to do so, in the same way that water appears to become a wave.

2:7 – The world appears because of self-ignorance and disappears owing to self-knowledge, just as a snake appears from non-cognition of a rope and disappears when the rope is recognized.

You only see the world when you don’t understand that it’s the self, the same way that you only see a snake when you don’t realize it’s a rope. And just as you can no longer see a snake when you become aware of the existence of the rope, you can no longer see the world when you have knowledge of the self. However, the literal meaning of the word “see” only applies to the example of the snake and the rope, because seeing a snake where there is only a rope is a perceptual error that disappears when the rope is known. But in the case of mistaking the self to be the world, even after you realize it is the self, the ‘snake’ of the world does not go away. You continue to perceive and experience the world exactly the same way as someone who does not know they are the self; the only difference is that you no longer believe the world is real.

2:8 – Light is my very nature and I am never other than that. I alone shine, even when the universe appears.

As previously mentioned (1:18), light is a metaphor for consciousness because it is the invariable factor in every experience that ‘illuminates’ all objects by making it possible for them to be known. Nothing in the universe has the ability to ‘shine’ in this way, not even apparently luminous objects such as the sun. Not even its light can ‘illumine’ anything—meaning make something known—without you, consciousness, being present.

2:9 – The universe appears in me, conceived through ignorance, just as silver appears in mother of pearl, as a snake appears in a rope or water appears in the desert (as a mirage).

As Janaka unequivocally states, the only reason the universe appears is ignorance. Although it seen it never actually exists, just as silver, a snake or water, although seen, never exist in mother of pearl, a rope or a mirage. From this fact it follows that there is no need to waste time trying to understand how or why the universe manifests because it never does. It only seems to when you do not know that it is really just you, consciousness/existence.

Even if that makes sense, you may be tempted to inquire into the nature of ignorance or perhaps to whom it belongs. But this too is unproductive, because the nature of self-ignorance, to state the obvious, is not knowing you are the self. And if you do not know you are the self, then the self-ignorance belongs to you. At that point the only pertinent thing to do is to get rid of the ignorance, not sit around pondering what ignorance is. Luckily, Vedanta gives you the tools to do this. Ironically, when inquiry guided by the logic of Vedanta removes ignorance, it clearly demonstrates that you, the self, were never ignorant in the first place; it only seemed that way when you thought you were the body-mind.

2:10 – Just as a clay pot is dissolved into clay, a wave is dissolved into water and a gold bracelet is dissolved into gold, so the universe which has emanated from me will dissolve into me.

There are two ways in which a clay pot, a wave and a gold bracelet can be dissolved into clay, water and gold, respectively. The first way is literal: the form of the clay pot, the wave or the gold bracelet are physically destroyed, leaving behind the clay, water or gold from which they are composed. The second way is figurative: the clay pot, wave or gold bracelet are ‘dissolved’ into clay, water or gold through understanding that a clay pot is nothing but clay, a wave is only water and a gold bracelet is none other than gold. In the same way, the universe is ‘dissolved’ into you, consciousness/existence, by the knowledge that it is consciousness/existence alone.

Have a question? ASK HERE.

Want to support the work of End of Knowledge? DONATE HERE.

Please help by using the “Share” buttons below to re-post this article on Twitter, Facebook or Google.

October 17, 2018
A Conversation with Ashtavakra Pt. 5

CHAPTER TWO

Through Ashtavakra’s instruction in the first chapter, Janaka gets enlightened. Chapter Two is Janaka’s statement of self-knowledge.

Read Part 4 here.

Janaka said:

2:1 – I am consciousness: without defect, tranquil, and beyond the material world. All this time I have been deceived by delusion.

As previously mentioned (in Part Two), enlightenment or self-knowledge is a matter of identity. When you are ignorant of your true nature, you mistakenly identify with the body-mind. But when you know what your true nature is, you correctly identify with consciousness. You can tell that Janaka now clearly identifies with consciousness instead of the body-mind by the way he starts speaking of consciousness in the first person, saying “I am consciousness” instead of “consciousness is (such and such)” as if he were describing something other than himself. For that reason, the verses in Chapter Two are excellent for meditation, recitation and contemplation.

When Janaka says that he is beyond the material world, it does not mean that consciousness is in one place and the material world in another because consciousness has no spatial location. Furthermore, since reality is non-dual, there cannot be both a world and consciousness. So to say that consciousness is beyond the material world means that consciousness is not affected by the illusory appearance of the world.

2:2 – As I alone reveal this body, even so do I reveal this universe. The entire universe is mine; or alternately, nothing is mine.

The entire universe—which includes the body—is a known object. That which knows it is consciousness. In this way consciousness ‘reveals’ everything in the universe.

In the second part of the verse Janaka switches from the empirical viewpoint to the absolute viewpoint (see 1:16 for explanation of viewpoints).   From the empirical viewpoint, which provisionally accepts the appearance of the universe, it can be said that everything ‘belongs’ to consciousness since everything is consciousness. Yet, from the absolute viewpoint, which does not admit of the universe whatsoever, nothing belongs to consciousness because there is nothing other than consciousness to belong to it.

2:3 – Having left behind the body and the universe, I now see the highest self.

When people get enlightened, they continue to have bodies that exist in the universe. If this were not so, then the moment Janaka got enlightened he would have disappeared and been unavailable to make these statements. Actually, if this were not so, Janaka would not have gotten enlightened in the first place because Ashtavakra, his enlightened teacher, wouldn’t have been there to teach him. So when Janaka says he has left behind the body and the universe, they remain as they are but he has ‘left them behind’ by recognizing them for the illusion they are and ceasing identification with the body.

In this chapter, Janaka starts referring to consciousness/existence as “the self” (atman). In the sense that consciousness/existence is what you truly are, it is the “self.” Therefore, the terms will be used synonymously in the text from here forward.

Sight being a common symbol of knowledge, when Janaka says that he sees the self he means he understands that he is the self, not that the self is some kind of object of perception. That this self is the “highest self” means that consciousness/existence is the true self, as opposed to the false self of the body-mind.

2:4 – As waves, foam and bubbles are not different from water, so the universe emanating from me is not different from me.

At first, Vedanta posits two fundamentally dualistic categories: self (consciousness/subject/knower/witness) and ‘not-self’ (non-conscious/object/known/witnessed). But seeing as reality is ultimately non-dual, these two categories can only be conditionally accepted. You may ask, “Then why use them at all?” The answer is that in the beginning of the teaching the concept of ‘not-self’ provides a stable and critically important platform from which to inquire, one that helps you objectify the body-mind and see that it is unreal. Once the body-mind is clearly known to be an illusion that never affects your true nature, the temporary dualistic split of self and ‘not-self’ must be mended in order for the ultimate truth of non-duality to be grasped. Examining the relationship between water and its various manifestations is an excellent way to do this.

Initially, it can be said that waves, foam and bubbles are different from water because the waves etc. are transient, ever-changing and possessed of form while the water is ever-present, unchanging and formless. But when the existence of the waves etc. is negated by the knowledge that they are only water, it must be said that the waves etc. are non-different from water because they are not really there; there is ever only water and therefore nothing else exists to be different from it.

Similarly, at first it can be said that the self and the ‘not-self’ are different because the ‘not-self’ is transient, ever-changing and possessed of form while the self (consciousness/existence) is ever-present, unchanging and formless. But when the existence of the ‘not-self’ is negated by knowledge that only the self exists, it must said that the ‘not-self’ is non-different from the self in the sense that there is nothing other than the self to be different from the self.

It could be argued that it would be more efficient to simply skip the first step that falsely admits of something other than the self in order to go directly to the truth of non-duality. However, very few people can do this because at first the idea of non-duality appears to stand in direct opposition to their everyday experience. And when people are still convinced that there is such a thing as the ‘not-self’ (objects of experience) it is not productive to merely deny its existence. Therefore, Vedanta, being eminently practical, offers an intermediate step. It conditionally accepts the ‘not-self’ and then provides you with the tools that are needed to understand that it only appears to exist while you, the self, are the only thing that actually exists. When that is known, the temporary difference between self and ‘not-self’ is discarded in favor of the non-dual view that there is only the self. This view is reiterated in the next verse using the analogy of cloth and thread and requires no additional commentary.

2:5 – As cloth, when analyzed, is found to be nothing but thread, so this universe, when analyzed, is nothing but me.

Have a question? ASK HERE.

Want to support the ongoing work of End of Knowledge? DONATE HERE.

October 10, 2018
A Conversation with Ashtavakra Pt. 2

1.8 – Being bitten by the great black snake of egoism, you think, “I am the doer.” To be happy, drink the nectar of the conviction, “I am not the doer.”

Identifying yourself with the ego—the thought or concept of “I” in the mind—is like the bite of a poisonous snake. How so? Because it leads to the false conviction that you are the one that acts when the body and mind act and thinking this is ‘fatal’ to happiness. When you believe, “I am doing this” or “I am doing that” you falsely claim ownership of the results of what the body and mind do. That this is an impediment to happiness is obvious when the results of body-mind’s actions are unpleasant. What is not as evident is that this is also an obstacle to happiness when the results are pleasant, the reason being that achieving a desirable result does not lead to permanent happiness. Once the pleasurable effect wears off, you are inevitably left with a desire to do something else to try to regain happiness, thus creating an endless cycle of action and desire that never lead to the contentment you want. So Ashtavakra astutely points out that if you truly want to be happy, step out of cycle of doing and enjoying entirely through understanding. When you have been poisoned by the belief, “I am the doer” the antidote is the conviction, “I am not the doer.” If you are not the doer, the problem of action, desire and reaping the results of action—good or bad—does not belong to you.

1.9 – “I am the one, pure consciousness.” In the fire of this conviction, burn down the forest of ignorance and be happy.

Just as a forest is made up of countless trees, the forest of ignorance is composed of the innumerable ways you can mistake yourself to be the body-mind. You ‘burn’ this ignorance with the conviction that you are the consciousness that knows, and is therefore free of, the body-mind and all of its problems. Or alternately, ignorance is incinerated by the conviction that since you are one alone, you are not affected by the body-mind because it is only an appearance. This is stated in the next verse.

1.10 – Although you are consciousness, the highest bliss, you are imagined to be the world, just as a rope is imagined to be a snake. Know this and live happily.

When a rope is mistaken to be a snake, the snake is only an appearance. Despite the illusion, nothing but the rope ever exists. Similarly, when you, consciousness, are imagined to be the world (“world” here includes the body-mind), the world is merely an appearance while nothing but you ever exists. Believing that there is actually a world is ignorance, an error based on the misperception of reality. When this error is corrected, you can live happily, knowing that the world, just like an illusory snake, can cause you no harm.

In this verse Ashtavakra says that consciousness is the highest bliss. The word “bliss” can only be taken in the metaphorical sense because bliss is a feeling, a state of mind, and it has been clearly stated that consciousness is free of the mind. A synonym for bliss is satisfaction, so by calling consciousness the highest satisfaction it indicates that the only way to get real satisfaction—as opposed to temporary satisfaction gained from everyday pursuits—is to understand what your true nature is. When that happens you see that you lack nothing and have nothing to fear because there is only you and you are never touched by the appearance of the world.

1.11 – He who considers himself free is free indeed and one who considers himself bound remains bound. “As one thinks, so one becomes,” is a popular saying in this world, and it is quite true.

In a text brimming with excellent verses, this is by far the finest because in two short sentences Ashtavakra gives a disarmingly simple summary of the essence of the entire teaching: freedom, self-knowledge, enlightenment, moksha or whatever you choose to call it is only a matter of how you think about yourself. While it is easy to get distracted by Vedanta’s ornate symbolism, hyperbolic metaphors, theoretical propositions, dazzling intellectual gymnastics and multitude of spiritual practices, freedom is really that simple. If your idea of self is “I am ever-free consciousness” then you are free because that is actually the truth. But if your idea of self is “I am the body-mind” then you are bound because that is the also the truth (at least for you). “As one thinks, so one becomes.” Take the word “becomes” loosely because you cannot become what you already are i.e. consciousness. And as consciousness your nature is ever-free so you cannot become bound any more than fire can become cold or water can become dry. You can only ‘become’ free by understanding you have always been free and you can only ‘become’ bound by believing you are bound.

Since it is so crucial, at the risk of being redundant, I want to repeat myself: freedom is how you think about yourself. That means right now is the time to start taking the stance that you are free even if you don’t yet understand how that can be. Every time you catch yourself identifying with the body-mind and thinking a limiting thought about yourself, stop and apply an opposing thought, one that is harmony with who you really are. If you find yourself identifying with the body thinking thoughts such as, “I am tall, short, skinny, fat, male, female, black, white, pretty, ugly etc.” stop and think, “I am not the body.” If you identify with the mind with thoughts such as, “I am happy, sad, angry, peaceful, afraid, focused, distracted etc.” stop and think, “I am not the mind.” If you find yourself thinking, “I am doing this, I am doing that” stop and think, “I am not the doer.” Or in general if you find yourself thinking in any way, “I am bound, I need to get free” stop and think, “I am free.” Regardless of whether or not you see how these assertions can be true, they are nonetheless fact, and in time the supporting logic behind the statements you are making will become clear. When they do, you have already put in the hard work to change the habitual thinking patterns of the mind, getting them into alignment with your true nature. This is something you will inevitably have to do, either before or after enlightenment, assuming you are interested in mental peace. So you might as well do it now.

Contrary to the belief that enlightenment is a momentous realization that occurs at the end of an incredibly difficult spiritual journey spanning countless lifetimes, one that can only be achieved by an exceedingly rare and select few, if you can see that it’s possible to change the way you think about yourself, then enlightenment is available to you in this very lifetime. “As one thinks, so one becomes.”

1.12 – You are consciousness, the all-pervading, full, actionless, unattached, desireless and peaceful witness. You appear as the world or of the world through error.

This verse provides a timely opportunity to practice thinking differently about yourself.   You can put it in first person, say it to yourself, and contemplate its implications. “I am consciousness, the all-pervading, full, actionless, desireless and peaceful witness.”

Of the words used to describe you in this verse, “full” and “peaceful” have not yet appeared in the text. “Full” means that as the non-dual reality, you are complete; there is nothing left out, nothing that can be added or taken away; you cannot be perfected because you are already perfect. “Peaceful” indicates that since you are ever-free witness of the conditions of the body-mind, you can never be disturbed.

Part 3 coming soon.

Have a question? ASK HERE.

Want to support the work of End of Knowledge? DONATE HERE.

September 19, 2018